https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219412 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to an 812-day delay in filing, attributing the delay to gross negligence by the appellant. Despite claiming lack of communication and citing Supreme Court judgments, the appellant failed to prove the delay was unintentional and reasonable. The Tribunal found the appellant's actions insufficient and vague, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred. The lack of a valid excuse and the appellant's negligence in pursuing the correct remedy resulted in the Tribunal rejecting the condonation application, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 May 2014 17:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219412 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to an 812-day delay in filing, attributing the delay to gross negligence by the appellant. Despite claiming lack of communication and citing Supreme Court judgments, the appellant failed to prove the delay was unintentional and reasonable. The Tribunal found the appellant's actions insufficient and vague, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred. The lack of a valid excuse and the appellant's negligence in pursuing the correct remedy resulted in the Tribunal rejecting the condonation application, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219412