https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219382 An advocate who files vakalatnamas and compromise deeds without authority commits serious professional misconduct where the complainant's evidence is consistent and remains unrebutted. The disciplinary finding was restored because the oral and documentary material supported the complaint and the reversal lacked sufficient basis. Punishment must match the gravity of the misconduct and serve deterrence and correction; given the misuse of professional position and prior disciplinary history, suspension from practice for three years was held appropriate. en-us Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Dec 2012 16:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219382 An advocate who files vakalatnamas and compromise deeds without authority commits serious professional misconduct where the complainant's evidence is consistent and remains unrebutted. The disciplinary finding was restored because the oral and documentary material supported the complaint and the reversal lacked sufficient basis. Punishment must match the gravity of the misconduct and serve deterrence and correction; given the misuse of professional position and prior disciplinary history, suspension from practice for three years was held appropriate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219382