<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 390 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219375</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application for modification of the Stay Order, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions regarding pre-deposit requirements for maintaining appeals under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the principle that the Tribunal cannot alter orders issued under Section 35F like an appellate authority and must uphold the legal framework governing pre-deposit conditions for appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 390 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219375</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Application for modification of the Stay Order, emphasizing the importance of adhering to statutory provisions regarding pre-deposit requirements for maintaining appeals under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision was based on the principle that the Tribunal cannot alter orders issued under Section 35F like an appellate authority and must uphold the legal framework governing pre-deposit conditions for appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>