<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219360</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the assessment order dated 20.8.2010 to be invalid due to lack of jurisdiction and quashed it. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer exceeded authority in passing the order under section 144C(13) without proper objection under section 144C(2). The Tribunal did not address the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) but advised the assessee to pursue legal remedies as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 375 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219360</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the assessment order dated 20.8.2010 to be invalid due to lack of jurisdiction and quashed it. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the Assessing Officer exceeded authority in passing the order under section 144C(13) without proper objection under section 144C(2). The Tribunal did not address the dismissal of the appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) but advised the assessee to pursue legal remedies as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>