<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 374 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the excise duty refund is to be treated as a capital receipt, allowing the appeals of both assessees. The issue of whether the refund should be included in business profits for deduction under section 80IB was not addressed due to the capital nature of the refund. The Tribunal also found the charging of interest under section 234-B to be consequential and decided accordingly, ruling it as arbitrary, unjust, and illegal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 374 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the excise duty refund is to be treated as a capital receipt, allowing the appeals of both assessees. The issue of whether the refund should be included in business profits for deduction under section 80IB was not addressed due to the capital nature of the refund. The Tribunal also found the charging of interest under section 234-B to be consequential and decided accordingly, ruling it as arbitrary, unjust, and illegal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>