<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 372 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219357</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, extending the period of stay of demand until 31st March, 2012, or until the disposal of the appeal, whichever was earlier. The decision was based on the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of relevant case law and statutory provisions, emphasizing the need to prevent injustice during the appeal process. The assessee was instructed not to seek adjournment during the appeal hearing, with non-compliance leading to the vacation of the stay granted, subject to the Bench&#039;s discretion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 372 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219357</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay petition, extending the period of stay of demand until 31st March, 2012, or until the disposal of the appeal, whichever was earlier. The decision was based on the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of relevant case law and statutory provisions, emphasizing the need to prevent injustice during the appeal process. The assessee was instructed not to seek adjournment during the appeal hearing, with non-compliance leading to the vacation of the stay granted, subject to the Bench&#039;s discretion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>