<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 369 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219354</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the set off of business loss against income assessed as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that since the source of the cash deposits was not proven, the unexplained investments should be treated as &quot;income from other sources,&quot; allowing for the set off of business loss as per section 71 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 369 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219354</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to permit the set off of business loss against income assessed as unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that since the source of the cash deposits was not proven, the unexplained investments should be treated as &quot;income from other sources,&quot; allowing for the set off of business loss as per section 71 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>