<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 349 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219334</link>
    <description>Revenue neutrality does not automatically bar invocation of the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The commentary notes that availability of credit to another unit is only one relevant factor and its significance depends on the facts. Where clearance of waste and scrap to a sister unit at a lower price was not disclosed to the Revenue, and no material showed a reasonable belief that disclosure was unnecessary, suppression of material facts supported invocation of the extended period. On that basis, the demand and penalty were sustained and the assessee&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 349 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219334</link>
      <description>Revenue neutrality does not automatically bar invocation of the extended limitation period under the proviso to Section 11A of the Central Excise Act. The commentary notes that availability of credit to another unit is only one relevant factor and its significance depends on the facts. Where clearance of waste and scrap to a sister unit at a lower price was not disclosed to the Revenue, and no material showed a reasonable belief that disclosure was unnecessary, suppression of material facts supported invocation of the extended period. On that basis, the demand and penalty were sustained and the assessee&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>