<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 315 - CESTAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219300</link>
    <description>Service tax paid on outdoor catering services used in a factory canteen is admissible as cenvat credit where binding Gujarat HC precedent squarely covers the issue. The Tribunal accepted that the Revenue&#039;s attempted factual distinctions did not displace the controlling authority, and applied the precedent directly to the canteen services at issue. Credit was therefore sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 315 - CESTAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219300</link>
      <description>Service tax paid on outdoor catering services used in a factory canteen is admissible as cenvat credit where binding Gujarat HC precedent squarely covers the issue. The Tribunal accepted that the Revenue&#039;s attempted factual distinctions did not displace the controlling authority, and applied the precedent directly to the canteen services at issue. Credit was therefore sustained and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>