https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219295 Direct averments that a company's directors were in charge of and responsible for its business were held sufficient to support prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act at the threshold. The complaint alleged that the directors issued the cheques in discharge of a legal liability, and Section 141 could not be defeated at the quashing stage merely by asserting lack of knowledge, which remained a matter for trial. As no illegality, perversity, or jurisdictional error was shown in the refusal to discharge, interference under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was declined and the complaint, summoning order, and discharge order were upheld. en-us Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Nov 2012 11:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219295 Direct averments that a company's directors were in charge of and responsible for its business were held sufficient to support prosecution under the Negotiable Instruments Act at the threshold. The complaint alleged that the directors issued the cheques in discharge of a legal liability, and Section 141 could not be defeated at the quashing stage merely by asserting lack of knowledge, which remained a matter for trial. As no illegality, perversity, or jurisdictional error was shown in the refusal to discharge, interference under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was declined and the complaint, summoning order, and discharge order were upheld. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219295