https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219294 Interference with refusal of interim relief is limited to cases where the trial court's discretion is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles, and on the facts the appellate court upheld the refusal because the settlement had been substantially implemented and no strong prima facie case for restraint was shown. A direction to deposit money could not stand where no such relief was pleaded, so that portion was set aside. The amendment of the plaint was sustained because it was sought at an early stage, before trial commenced, and the proposed changes were matters for trial without altering the suit's essential character or causing legally significant prejudice. en-us Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219294 Interference with refusal of interim relief is limited to cases where the trial court's discretion is arbitrary, capricious, perverse, or contrary to settled principles, and on the facts the appellate court upheld the refusal because the settlement had been substantially implemented and no strong prima facie case for restraint was shown. A direction to deposit money could not stand where no such relief was pleaded, so that portion was set aside. The amendment of the plaint was sustained because it was sought at an early stage, before trial commenced, and the proposed changes were matters for trial without altering the suit's essential character or causing legally significant prejudice. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219294