<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 301 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219286</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted stay applications unconditionally in a case involving service tax confirmation and penalties for services related to signalling and telecom systems for railways. The Tribunal considered conflicting decisions, including ABB Ltd. v. CST, Bangalore and Alstom Projects India Ltd. v. CST, Delhi, and pending appeals before the Supreme Court. Granting relief to the assessee, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to provide stay on the demands for the period from 2002 to 31st March 2009 due to the unresolved issues and conflicting interpretations of works contract service exemption for services provided to railways.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 07:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 301 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219286</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted stay applications unconditionally in a case involving service tax confirmation and penalties for services related to signalling and telecom systems for railways. The Tribunal considered conflicting decisions, including ABB Ltd. v. CST, Bangalore and Alstom Projects India Ltd. v. CST, Delhi, and pending appeals before the Supreme Court. Granting relief to the assessee, the Tribunal deemed it appropriate to provide stay on the demands for the period from 2002 to 31st March 2009 due to the unresolved issues and conflicting interpretations of works contract service exemption for services provided to railways.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>