<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 289 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under section 35DDA for payments made to employees under the Exit Option Scheme. The Tribunal clarified that compliance with Rule 2BA is not mandatory for deductions under section 35DDA, indicating legislative intent to keep the voluntary retirement scheme open-ended without restrictions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 21:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 289 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under section 35DDA for payments made to employees under the Exit Option Scheme. The Tribunal clarified that compliance with Rule 2BA is not mandatory for deductions under section 35DDA, indicating legislative intent to keep the voluntary retirement scheme open-ended without restrictions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>