<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 287 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219272</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the loss on account of irrecoverable advance written off was incidental to the business and should be allowed as a deduction. The Tribunal emphasized the direct nexus between the business operations of the assessee and the loss, classifying it as a revenue loss rather than a capital loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 287 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219272</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the loss on account of irrecoverable advance written off was incidental to the business and should be allowed as a deduction. The Tribunal emphasized the direct nexus between the business operations of the assessee and the loss, classifying it as a revenue loss rather than a capital loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219272</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>