<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 285 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition related to the forfeiture of deposit and the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the significance of considering the nature of the receipt and the source of funds in determining taxability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 285 - ITAT, PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the addition related to the forfeiture of deposit and the disallowance of interest under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment highlighted the significance of considering the nature of the receipt and the source of funds in determining taxability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>