<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 280 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219265</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the interpretation of the definition of a capital asset under the IT Act and the significance of proximity to municipal limits in determining tax liability on capital gains from the sale of land. The ITAT held that the land transferred by the assessee constituted a capital asset and was liable for capital gains tax, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made towards long-term capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 280 - ITAT, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219265</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the interpretation of the definition of a capital asset under the IT Act and the significance of proximity to municipal limits in determining tax liability on capital gains from the sale of land. The ITAT held that the land transferred by the assessee constituted a capital asset and was liable for capital gains tax, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made towards long-term capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>