<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 271 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219256</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to revoke the CHA license of M/s. Santon Shipping Services due to violations of Regulations 12, 13(a), and 13(b) of CHALR, 2004. The CHA allowed a third party to use its license for monetary gain and failed to obtain proper authorization from the exporter, leading to the revocation of the license. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 271 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219256</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to revoke the CHA license of M/s. Santon Shipping Services due to violations of Regulations 12, 13(a), and 13(b) of CHALR, 2004. The CHA allowed a third party to use its license for monetary gain and failed to obtain proper authorization from the exporter, leading to the revocation of the license. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>