<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 270 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219255</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appellants&#039; contentions on delay, jurisdiction, and the requirement of reconciliation statements. It upheld the demand for duty on the two High Speed Take-up machines and confirmed the violation of Project Import Regulations due to the shifting of machinery. The tribunal also directed the appellants to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the customs duty, considering the financial position of the appellants and the interest of revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 270 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219255</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appellants&#039; contentions on delay, jurisdiction, and the requirement of reconciliation statements. It upheld the demand for duty on the two High Speed Take-up machines and confirmed the violation of Project Import Regulations due to the shifting of machinery. The tribunal also directed the appellants to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the customs duty, considering the financial position of the appellants and the interest of revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>