<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 259 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim for CENVAT credit refund, emphasizing that the export of goods under &#039;nil&#039; rate of duty does not necessitate the execution of a bond for claiming such credit. The judgment clarified the interpretation of &#039;exempted goods&#039; and the conditions for claiming CENVAT credit under the relevant rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 20:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 259 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim for CENVAT credit refund, emphasizing that the export of goods under &#039;nil&#039; rate of duty does not necessitate the execution of a bond for claiming such credit. The judgment clarified the interpretation of &#039;exempted goods&#039; and the conditions for claiming CENVAT credit under the relevant rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>