<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 257 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219242</link>
    <description>The court upheld the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts. However, the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06 were quashed as they were based on a change of opinion. The court emphasized the significance of full disclosure and distinguished between a change of opinion and new factual information in reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 257 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219242</link>
      <description>The court upheld the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04 due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to fully disclose material facts. However, the reassessment proceedings for the assessment years 2004-05 and 2005-06 were quashed as they were based on a change of opinion. The court emphasized the significance of full disclosure and distinguished between a change of opinion and new factual information in reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>