<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 254 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219239</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of brokerage charges and the mandatory nature of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal allowed the business loss claimed by the assessee and directed the recomputation of capital gains based on the valuation provided by the District Valuation Officer, rejecting the arbitrary increase made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 19:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 254 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219239</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, confirming the disallowance of brokerage charges and the mandatory nature of interest under sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal allowed the business loss claimed by the assessee and directed the recomputation of capital gains based on the valuation provided by the District Valuation Officer, rejecting the arbitrary increase made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>