<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 249 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete disallowances under Section 40A(2)(b) of the IT Act for interest-free advances made to specified persons. The Tribunal found the payments reasonable and beneficial for the assessee&#039;s business, noting the lack of substantial evidence supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s calculations. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-evaluate the adjustment of Excise Duty on closing stock under Section 145A of the IT Act for the relevant assessment year, in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 249 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete disallowances under Section 40A(2)(b) of the IT Act for interest-free advances made to specified persons. The Tribunal found the payments reasonable and beneficial for the assessee&#039;s business, noting the lack of substantial evidence supporting the Assessing Officer&#039;s calculations. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-evaluate the adjustment of Excise Duty on closing stock under Section 145A of the IT Act for the relevant assessment year, in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>