<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 242 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219227</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowances related to partner payments and hire charges. However, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was confirmed for academic reasons. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of meeting statutory requirements and the potential curability of procedural defects in tax cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 242 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219227</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, overturning the disallowances related to partner payments and hire charges. However, the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was confirmed for academic reasons. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of meeting statutory requirements and the potential curability of procedural defects in tax cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>