<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219221</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that the income from compensation for shared facilities and license fees should be included in the book profit for computing partner remuneration. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to include the amount in the book profit and allow the remuneration as claimed by the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal agreed with the assessee&#039;s argument on maintaining consistency in assessing income and directed the Assessing Officer to provide consequential relief regarding the levy of interest under section 220(2). The alternate claim for assessing shared asset income under &quot;Income from House Property&quot; was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 236 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219221</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that the income from compensation for shared facilities and license fees should be included in the book profit for computing partner remuneration. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to include the amount in the book profit and allow the remuneration as claimed by the assessee. Additionally, the tribunal agreed with the assessee&#039;s argument on maintaining consistency in assessing income and directed the Assessing Officer to provide consequential relief regarding the levy of interest under section 220(2). The alternate claim for assessing shared asset income under &quot;Income from House Property&quot; was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>