<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 235 - High Court of Uttarakhand</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219220</link>
    <description>Duplex coated board, mill board and grey board were held to fall within the expression &quot;articles of packing&quot; in Entry No. 9 of Schedule II(B) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The entry was construed as inclusive, so its scope was not limited to the examples of boxes, cases and cartons expressly mentioned. Applying the commercial parlance test, the boards were treated as packing articles because they are commonly understood in the market as materials used for packing. Taxability was determined by the character of the goods sold, not by their later use. The Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld and no interference was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 235 - High Court of Uttarakhand</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219220</link>
      <description>Duplex coated board, mill board and grey board were held to fall within the expression &quot;articles of packing&quot; in Entry No. 9 of Schedule II(B) of the Uttarakhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005. The entry was construed as inclusive, so its scope was not limited to the examples of boxes, cases and cartons expressly mentioned. Applying the commercial parlance test, the boards were treated as packing articles because they are commonly understood in the market as materials used for packing. Taxability was determined by the character of the goods sold, not by their later use. The Tribunal&#039;s view was upheld and no interference was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>