<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 211 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219196</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Katha business of the charitable trust was not exempt under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act as it was not held under trust and was not found to be incidental to the trust&#039;s charitable objectives. The Court emphasized the distinction between a business held under trust and a business carried on by the trust, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue and denying the trust&#039;s entitlement to exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 211 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219196</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Katha business of the charitable trust was not exempt under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act as it was not held under trust and was not found to be incidental to the trust&#039;s charitable objectives. The Court emphasized the distinction between a business held under trust and a business carried on by the trust, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue and denying the trust&#039;s entitlement to exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>