<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 210 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219195</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the treatment of provision for warranty and disallowance of &quot;slow moving finished goods&quot; for income tax purposes. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the provision for warranty should not be considered a provision for diminution in asset value under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the disallowance related to slow-moving finished goods, finding the assessee&#039;s method of accounting based on commercially accepted principles to be reasonable and scientific. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, favoring the assessee in all aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 210 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219195</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving the treatment of provision for warranty and disallowance of &quot;slow moving finished goods&quot; for income tax purposes. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the provision for warranty should not be considered a provision for diminution in asset value under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the Court supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the disallowance related to slow-moving finished goods, finding the assessee&#039;s method of accounting based on commercially accepted principles to be reasonable and scientific. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals, favoring the assessee in all aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>