<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 206 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219191</link>
    <description>The quantum appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the deduction claimed for premium payable on deep discount bonds. The penalty appeal was dismissed, as the Tribunal found no justification for the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The cross objections raised by the assessee regarding various disallowances and interest levy under Section 234B were also dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 206 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219191</link>
      <description>The quantum appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the deduction claimed for premium payable on deep discount bonds. The penalty appeal was dismissed, as the Tribunal found no justification for the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The cross objections raised by the assessee regarding various disallowances and interest levy under Section 234B were also dismissed by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>