<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 202 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219187</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee on all grounds. It held that interest income on Deep Discount Bonds (DDBs) should not be recognized on an accrual basis if the assessee follows the cash system of accounting. The gains from the sale of interest coupon strips were classified as long-term capital gains, and consequently, the deduction under Section 54EC was allowed. The tribunal&#039;s decision was consistent with its earlier rulings, respecting the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 202 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219187</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee on all grounds. It held that interest income on Deep Discount Bonds (DDBs) should not be recognized on an accrual basis if the assessee follows the cash system of accounting. The gains from the sale of interest coupon strips were classified as long-term capital gains, and consequently, the deduction under Section 54EC was allowed. The tribunal&#039;s decision was consistent with its earlier rulings, respecting the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>