<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 197 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the admissibility of Cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering Service used for canteen facilities for employees. While the lower authorities did not consider the Bombay High Court ruling regarding recovery from employees affecting Cenvat credit, the Tribunal emphasized the need to reevaluate based on new legal positions. Consequently, the Revenue was granted the right to verify and demand payment for consideration recovered from employees, but the appeal was ultimately rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 197 - CESTAT, New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the admissibility of Cenvat credit on Outdoor Catering Service used for canteen facilities for employees. While the lower authorities did not consider the Bombay High Court ruling regarding recovery from employees affecting Cenvat credit, the Tribunal emphasized the need to reevaluate based on new legal positions. Consequently, the Revenue was granted the right to verify and demand payment for consideration recovered from employees, but the appeal was ultimately rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>