<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 180 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219165</link>
    <description>Payment of the differential duty and the respondent&#039;s express decision not to seek a refund rendered the valuation dispute academic on the facts presented. Where no refund claim is pursued after duty is paid, the contested valuation issue does not require further adjudication, and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed on that basis. The cross objections were disposed of for the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 19:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 180 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219165</link>
      <description>Payment of the differential duty and the respondent&#039;s express decision not to seek a refund rendered the valuation dispute academic on the facts presented. Where no refund claim is pursued after duty is paid, the contested valuation issue does not require further adjudication, and the Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed on that basis. The cross objections were disposed of for the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>