<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 168 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219153</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, concluding that the non-compete commission received by the assessee should be taxed as salary income and not as business income. The appeals were allowed in favor of the revenue, emphasizing the inclusive definition of salary under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 08:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 168 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219153</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the revenue, concluding that the non-compete commission received by the assessee should be taxed as salary income and not as business income. The appeals were allowed in favor of the revenue, emphasizing the inclusive definition of salary under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>