<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 162 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219147</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, revoking the Customs House Agent&#039;s license and forfeiting the guarantee due to subletting the license by signing blank papers. The appellant&#039;s lack of active involvement in CHA duties posed a revenue risk, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking a substantive legal question. The Court stressed the principal&#039;s liability for the power of attorney holder&#039;s actions, referencing a Madras High Court judgment on CHA misconduct, ultimately denying the appeal based on established precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 162 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219147</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, revoking the Customs House Agent&#039;s license and forfeiting the guarantee due to subletting the license by signing blank papers. The appellant&#039;s lack of active involvement in CHA duties posed a revenue risk, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lacking a substantive legal question. The Court stressed the principal&#039;s liability for the power of attorney holder&#039;s actions, referencing a Madras High Court judgment on CHA misconduct, ultimately denying the appeal based on established precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219147</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>