<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 157 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219142</link>
    <description>The court found that the appropriation of rebate amounts by the second respondent against alleged service tax dues was not sustainable. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to procedural fairness and directed the second respondent to reconsider the rebate claim. Additionally, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was instructed to expedite the appeals process. The writ petition was granted in favor of the petitioner with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 157 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219142</link>
      <description>The court found that the appropriation of rebate amounts by the second respondent against alleged service tax dues was not sustainable. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to procedural fairness and directed the second respondent to reconsider the rebate claim. Additionally, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was instructed to expedite the appeals process. The writ petition was granted in favor of the petitioner with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>