<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 156 - CHATTISGARH  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219141</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of a notification rescinding an earlier notification regarding tax rates on steel tubes manufacturing. The court emphasized the need for proper assessment by the Assessing Authority and stated that without the necessary facts, the petition could not be entertained. The petitioner was advised to follow proper legal procedures if they wished to challenge the decision further. Each party was directed to bear their own costs, and the petition was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 156 - CHATTISGARH  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219141</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of a notification rescinding an earlier notification regarding tax rates on steel tubes manufacturing. The court emphasized the need for proper assessment by the Assessing Authority and stated that without the necessary facts, the petition could not be entertained. The petitioner was advised to follow proper legal procedures if they wished to challenge the decision further. Each party was directed to bear their own costs, and the petition was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>