<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery for an appellant seeking relief from duty amount, interest, and penalty on ineligible cenvat credit for inputs received before factory registration. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s clarification on input consumption during construction, lack of dispute on the actual utilization, and a favorable precedent from a previous order. The Tribunal emphasized the correlation between input receipt and utilization, highlighting the significance of registration for credit availment. This ruling provided fair relief to the appellant, showcasing a reasoned approach to the complex issue of cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the waiver of pre-deposit and stayed recovery for an appellant seeking relief from duty amount, interest, and penalty on ineligible cenvat credit for inputs received before factory registration. The decision was based on the appellant&#039;s clarification on input consumption during construction, lack of dispute on the actual utilization, and a favorable precedent from a previous order. The Tribunal emphasized the correlation between input receipt and utilization, highlighting the significance of registration for credit availment. This ruling provided fair relief to the appellant, showcasing a reasoned approach to the complex issue of cenvat credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>