<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 142 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal decided to grant final disposal of the appeal without pre-deposit, challenging a duty demand due to denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods. The appellant claimed depreciation under the Income Tax Act, supported by relevant documents not examined by the original authority. As crucial documents were not considered, the matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for thorough examination and a detailed order. The Tribunal directed the original authority to reevaluate all issues, allowing the assessee a fair chance to present evidence, ultimately highlighting the importance of a comprehensive reconsideration of the issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 142 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal decided to grant final disposal of the appeal without pre-deposit, challenging a duty demand due to denial of CENVAT credit on capital goods. The appellant claimed depreciation under the Income Tax Act, supported by relevant documents not examined by the original authority. As crucial documents were not considered, the matter was remanded for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need for thorough examination and a detailed order. The Tribunal directed the original authority to reevaluate all issues, allowing the assessee a fair chance to present evidence, ultimately highlighting the importance of a comprehensive reconsideration of the issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>