<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 128 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notices issued under Section 148 and Section 143(2) and reversed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 14.45 lakh made under Section 68 for unexplained credits. The AO&#039;s detailed investigation and reliance on the pattern of transactions in the bank accounts were deemed sufficient to support the addition. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 128 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the notices issued under Section 148 and Section 143(2) and reversed the deletion of the addition of Rs. 14.45 lakh made under Section 68 for unexplained credits. The AO&#039;s detailed investigation and reliance on the pattern of transactions in the bank accounts were deemed sufficient to support the addition. The revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the cross-objection of the assessee was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>