<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 127 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219112</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the delay in filing, applicability of deduction u/s. 10A, and verification of export proceeds. The Tribunal granted condonation for the delay in filing the appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 10A based on the RBI circular. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to verify export proceeds using FIRCs for deduction calculation, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s grounds in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 127 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219112</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the delay in filing, applicability of deduction u/s. 10A, and verification of export proceeds. The Tribunal granted condonation for the delay in filing the appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction under section 10A based on the RBI circular. Additionally, the Tribunal supported the CIT(A)&#039;s directive to verify export proceeds using FIRCs for deduction calculation, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s grounds in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>