<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 125 -  ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside all issues to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication in compliance with Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural compliance when admitting additional evidence at the appellate stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 08:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192480" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 125 -  ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside all issues to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication in compliance with Rule 46A of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of procedural compliance when admitting additional evidence at the appellate stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>