<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 108 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219093</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to assess the transaction value for &#039;Artificial marble&#039; and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal to enhance the assessable value. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the rejection of the appellant&#039;s request for a detention certificate, agreeing with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the goods were not seized or detained as required by regulations. Both appeals were dismissed, maintaining the original decisions on the transaction value assessment and the denial of the detention certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 108 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219093</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to assess the transaction value for &#039;Artificial marble&#039; and rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal to enhance the assessable value. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the rejection of the appellant&#039;s request for a detention certificate, agreeing with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the goods were not seized or detained as required by regulations. Both appeals were dismissed, maintaining the original decisions on the transaction value assessment and the denial of the detention certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>