https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219092 The court dismissed three company petitions concerning claims for amounts due to lock-in periods or damages for delay, ruling that these claims did not constitute crystallized debts under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioners were advised to pursue their claims through appropriate adjudicatory forums. en-us Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Nov 2012 13:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219092 The court dismissed three company petitions concerning claims for amounts due to lock-in periods or damages for delay, ruling that these claims did not constitute crystallized debts under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioners were advised to pursue their claims through appropriate adjudicatory forums. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219092