<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 99 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219084</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi confirmed duty against the appellant for billets cleared without payment to parties. The Tribunal held that clearances to SEZ should be considered as exports, settling the issue. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty confirmation order. The appeal, stay petition, and miscellaneous application were disposed of accordingly, with the cross objection by the Revenue also addressed and resolved by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 99 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219084</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi confirmed duty against the appellant for billets cleared without payment to parties. The Tribunal held that clearances to SEZ should be considered as exports, settling the issue. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty confirmation order. The appeal, stay petition, and miscellaneous application were disposed of accordingly, with the cross objection by the Revenue also addressed and resolved by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>