https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219081 The court upheld the rejection of the appellant's miscellaneous application in an appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act. The appellant failed to deposit 25% of the penalty within 30 days from the date of the order, leading to the Tribunal's denial of condonation of delay. The court ruled that the payment deadline was correctly set from the date of the order, not the date of communication, as argued by the appellant. Effective communication was deemed to have occurred when the appellant's counsel was present during the order's passing, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219081 The court upheld the rejection of the appellant's miscellaneous application in an appeal under Section 35-G of the Central Excise Act. The appellant failed to deposit 25% of the penalty within 30 days from the date of the order, leading to the Tribunal's denial of condonation of delay. The court ruled that the payment deadline was correctly set from the date of the order, not the date of communication, as argued by the appellant. Effective communication was deemed to have occurred when the appellant's counsel was present during the order's passing, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219081