<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219066</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the set off of unabsorbed depreciation against income from other sources under Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Court clarified that Section 72(2) does not restrict such set off, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 1998-99.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 14:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219066</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, allowing the set off of unabsorbed depreciation against income from other sources under Section 32(2) of the Income Tax Act. The Court clarified that Section 72(2) does not restrict such set off, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s order for the assessment year 1998-99.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>