<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 75 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219060</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax appeal case, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issues surrounding depreciation under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act. The Court found no legal question warranting intervention and dismissed the appeal, highlighting the Assessing Officer&#039;s initial acceptance of the investment allowance claim and the Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the machinery transfer and leasing arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 75 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219060</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax appeal case, emphasizing the debatable nature of the issues surrounding depreciation under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act. The Court found no legal question warranting intervention and dismissed the appeal, highlighting the Assessing Officer&#039;s initial acceptance of the investment allowance claim and the Tribunal&#039;s analysis of the machinery transfer and leasing arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>