<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 62 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty on Long Term Capital Gain but set aside the penalty on Short Term Capital Gain. The penalty order was deemed within the limitation period, and the concealment of income related to Long Term Capital Gain justified the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:54:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192417" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 62 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty on Long Term Capital Gain but set aside the penalty on Short Term Capital Gain. The penalty order was deemed within the limitation period, and the concealment of income related to Long Term Capital Gain justified the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>