<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 51 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219036</link>
    <description>The writ petition was disposed of in line with the earlier common order requiring Customs to assess the goods under the Customs Act and, if necessary, adjudicate the matter by reference to the applicable Foreign Trade Policy and notification. The operative effect was that the customs authority retained the matter for assessment and any needed adjudication under the governing import and trade framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 01:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 51 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219036</link>
      <description>The writ petition was disposed of in line with the earlier common order requiring Customs to assess the goods under the Customs Act and, if necessary, adjudicate the matter by reference to the applicable Foreign Trade Policy and notification. The operative effect was that the customs authority retained the matter for assessment and any needed adjudication under the governing import and trade framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>