<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 42 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the appeal and reinstated it along with the stay application. The counsel for the appellant mentioned that the stay application was no longer relevant as the duty amount with interest had been deposited in full. This submission was uncontested, leading to the dismissal of the stay application as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 42 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the appeal and reinstated it along with the stay application. The counsel for the appellant mentioned that the stay application was no longer relevant as the duty amount with interest had been deposited in full. This submission was uncontested, leading to the dismissal of the stay application as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>