<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 36 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219021</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that service tax should be levied on the actual amounts received by the service provider as per Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found no evidence that the disputed amounts were received by the appellant, thereby waiving the pre-deposit requirement for appeal admission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=192391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 36 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219021</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that service tax should be levied on the actual amounts received by the service provider as per Section 67 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal found no evidence that the disputed amounts were received by the appellant, thereby waiving the pre-deposit requirement for appeal admission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=219021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>